Hello you people out there!?
It is time again, at least for me, to write something down which could
interest you. As you noticed from the headline, this topic will deal
with the events occuring in Côte d'Ivoire (Ivory Coast).
First of all, I have to inform you that I am just starting to
investigate this issue, so please, if this article is not complete nor
conclusive to you, deal with it as a sort of introduction. Thank
you. :-)
You may wonder: "why Côte d'Ivoire?" Well, since two days I've spent
my time thinking about political issues which are going on at this
moment. And then, it appeared ... Why does the Western media deal so
much with this tiny little country, called Côte d'Ivoire/Ivory Coast?
Because it plays an essential role for the West and its ambitions for
a new world order. That is why it is in the news. So? Where's your
proof? This time it's Wikipedia and the Encyclopædia Britannica.
You can check out the sources here:
http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/914116/Laurent-Gbagbo
and here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alassane_Ouattara
As far as I understood this whole issue and the texts, there was an
election taking place and the opponent of that time President,
Alassane Ouattara, stating prior to the official deadline that he won
the election with 54 % of the votes. The Constitutional Court of Ivory
Coast contested that claim and rejected this result due to
irregularites and not respecting the official deadline of
announcement. Lauren Gbagbo scarcely won the election with 51 %.
Immediately the West stepped in stating the results were not right and
Alassane Ouattara would be the legitimate successor of Gbagbo. Why
this interest? Why, for instance, this urgent pressure put upon Gbagbo
to step down from office? Simply because he is not Western friendly
enough and, moreover, he is not "one of them".
"You must be kidding me? Pardon me?" No, it's true. Think about it but
before you do so, just read the first lines of Alassane Ouattara's
curriculum vitæ. He worked for International Monetary Fund (IMF) and
the Central Bank of Western African States (BCEAO) or also known as
'Banque Centrale des États de l'Afrique de l'Ouest' in French. Thus,
Alassane Ouattara is not only involved in big (Western) business but
is/was a key figure. You can bet your arse that he wasn't just a
regular worker like you and me. Come on! It's rediculous to even
mention that. He played a big role in these organizations. At the
moment, I can only guess so but it would not be much of a hazzle to
ask them what his main task was and how much influence he has had.
You still think I am nuts? Tell you what! The International Monetary
Fund stopped giving Ivory Coast loans. Furthermore the African Union
(A.U.), yes we had this one(!), and the arm of the BCEAO, the Economic
Community of Western African States suspended the membership of this
particular country. Why? Because Gbagbo is still in charge of
business. This will change if Ouattara becomes President of Côte
d'Ivoire.
So, why these undertaken actions? To put this country in line with the
Western agenda of a global government, also known as the New World
Order! There we have it again.
Keep ya all up2date. ;-)
my feeds to go ...
Posts
All Comments
Sunday, April 3, 2011
Why Gaddhafi is fought by the West!
We all know or at least heard about the ongoings in Libya and that the
rebels, with the help of the "West", is currently gaining control over
lost cities taken over by Gaddhafi weeks ago.
As you may know everything happens on this planet for a reason,
especially on a political level. If you think this way this will
automatically lead to the question:"For what reason is there a war
going on in Libya?"
Oil? Far too easy but yes! :D
Why? Think about it, a country with no money goes on war to "free" the
people from a dictatorship and uses masses of military. Come on ...
we're living in a capitalized society! So, who pays for it? The
taxpayer of that country, namely the U.S. aka the land of the not so
free? Nooo, Irak itself! Cool, isn't it? Go on war and the people over
there, no matter if they like it or not, have to pay for it. Awesome,
this is how we would like to see war! Damn that's good. But wait,
American soldiers aren't invaded Libya, you may say! True, but the
support from air is not for free! Thus, the main task is to let the
people let you voluntarily hand over the oil! And that's what's
happening right now!!! You can not see it, let me explain it to you
briefly:
Here we are now, the rebels are fighting Gaddhafi for their rights
(which is a good thing) and actually failed to take over control of
the whole country. To make things even worse they were forced to draw
back. OMG, that's ugly ... yeah I know. But then ... the "holy West"
decided to participate and help the poor rebels to have (at least) a
chance against Gaddhafi. This is what the media is telling us, right?
Okay, but an Italian minister admitted that these attacks from the
West isn't covered by the resolution! Ohhhh ... tell you what ... they
don't care! Why? Because they aim to replace Gaddhafi. This leads to
the very first question from before:"For what reason is there a war
going on in Libya?"
Now it's getting (seriously) interesting! :D
Do you know that Africa has an African Union something similiar to the
European Union? No? Then look it up for yourself! This A.U. is
actually a bad joke and has no power nor is it even influentual! You
can, again, look it up yourself, there are many critics and comments
from reporters and so forth who claim that.
Why is it so important you may ask? Mhhh, the ultimate goal of the NWO
(New World Order) is what? Yeah, a one world government, financial
management system (currency included) and the same laws! To achieve
this you have to undertake incremental steps like forming a European
Union, North American Union, African Union, etc. If you only have a
couple of regions/organizations left it'll be a whole lot easier to
form then a one world government!
Thus, as the A.U. is too weak, you have to come up with another
organization. Is there any? Yep, indeed! There is one! The United
States of Africa (USA)! :D
What does it have to do with the riots in Libya? Well, guess who the
chairman of the USA (United States of Africa) is Gaddhafi! Oh shit!
No, not really because he was always supported by the West. So, what
does the West have for a problem with Gaddhafi then? To put it
straight, he has different opions on how the system of the USA should
look like. He stated that there should be only one political party
because a multi-party-system would lead to bloodshed! Woah, that's
intriguing. Guess what? The West does not like this idea because it is
obviously a dictatorship ... well we all live in one as well but it
looks and feels nicer! At least on the surface it should give all the
people, including us, the idea of a bright shining democratic and
humanitarian system.
Hence, the West has to replace him to provide the USA (United States
of Africa) a leader which coincides with the West's picture of an
union.
Here are two links you all should consider. The first one is an
article from Wikipedia and the second one contains an article from the
BBC reporting over the last summit.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_of_Africa#cite_note-divisi...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/7868828.stm
Update 1:
Only a couple of days ago after I spoke my mind about the ongoings in
Libya, the BBC published an article which stated that the Libyan
rebels signed a deal with Qatar to export oil from the Rebels'
controled land. Here is the quote:"We are producing about 100,000 to
130,000 barrels a day, we can easily up that to about 300,000 a day."
You can find the full article here:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-12875810
Oh, I almost forgot to mention the primordial purpose of the
Coalition's bombings ... to protect the Libyan population from air
attacks. If you, as a country, have the intention to stop these
bombings to prevent a massacre, what do you have to do? You have to
bomb, as well! :D
In this case not the population but the anti-air installations to then
be easier able to impose a no-fly zone. But as you have Americans on
board there could be some collateral damage, like always. ^^
According to German news 'Tagesschau' Obama stated that "Gaddhafi
needs to step down" because he lost the confidence of his people
(which he never had before but the West didn't care anyways) so that
he holds no legitimacy anymore. Oh, and from tomorrow on the
Coalition's forces are put under order of the NATO. It is currently
aimed to support the Rebels forces and by "support" I don't mean air
strikes but weapons or I don't know ... We will see!
Here is the full speech of Obama:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jRf6UVwVOE4
Update 2:
Today I read an article pointing out the reasons for
interventions from the West. The report was written by Susan Lindauer,
former U.S. Asset who covered Libya at the United Nations from 1995 to
2003. She claims that American oil companies forced the government to
oppose Gaddhafi because he introduced "special" fees targeted at
American oil companies to get his money back from the compensations he
had to pay for the victims of the plane bombing of Pan AM flight 103.
You can read the article hear.
http://weeklyintercept.blogspot.com/2011/04/libyas-blood-for-oil-vamp...
Update 3:
Oh yes, baby! There we have it! Not only were the Western oil companies forced to pay a hefty fee but Gaddhifi considered to nationalize oil companies! (That would be cool, though!) The main reason for his consideration is based on "low oil prices", he said one month ago towards students of the prestigious Georgetown University. Furthermore Libyan authorities told oil firms "to cut output by 270,000 barrels per day from January 1". My second news update refered to Western oil companies, especially American ones, who headed to D.C. to start whining about the current situation in Libya. To me, it seems that the U.S. tolerated the fee but went "postal" after they had heard what Gaddhafi has been put into Libya's consideration! :D
Gaddhafi also thought about leaving the OPEC due to its quotas. He stated that Libya would not accept the current oil price and would then, as a result of the price, cease exports.
Wow, someone did not want to play the (fucked up) Americans' game here, right?
You can read the full article here:
http://uk.reuters.com/article/2009/01/21/businessproind-us-libya-gaddafi-oil-idUKTRE50K61F20090121
rebels, with the help of the "West", is currently gaining control over
lost cities taken over by Gaddhafi weeks ago.
As you may know everything happens on this planet for a reason,
especially on a political level. If you think this way this will
automatically lead to the question:"For what reason is there a war
going on in Libya?"
Oil? Far too easy but yes! :D
Why? Think about it, a country with no money goes on war to "free" the
people from a dictatorship and uses masses of military. Come on ...
we're living in a capitalized society! So, who pays for it? The
taxpayer of that country, namely the U.S. aka the land of the not so
free? Nooo, Irak itself! Cool, isn't it? Go on war and the people over
there, no matter if they like it or not, have to pay for it. Awesome,
this is how we would like to see war! Damn that's good. But wait,
American soldiers aren't invaded Libya, you may say! True, but the
support from air is not for free! Thus, the main task is to let the
people let you voluntarily hand over the oil! And that's what's
happening right now!!! You can not see it, let me explain it to you
briefly:
Here we are now, the rebels are fighting Gaddhafi for their rights
(which is a good thing) and actually failed to take over control of
the whole country. To make things even worse they were forced to draw
back. OMG, that's ugly ... yeah I know. But then ... the "holy West"
decided to participate and help the poor rebels to have (at least) a
chance against Gaddhafi. This is what the media is telling us, right?
Okay, but an Italian minister admitted that these attacks from the
West isn't covered by the resolution! Ohhhh ... tell you what ... they
don't care! Why? Because they aim to replace Gaddhafi. This leads to
the very first question from before:"For what reason is there a war
going on in Libya?"
Now it's getting (seriously) interesting! :D
Do you know that Africa has an African Union something similiar to the
European Union? No? Then look it up for yourself! This A.U. is
actually a bad joke and has no power nor is it even influentual! You
can, again, look it up yourself, there are many critics and comments
from reporters and so forth who claim that.
Why is it so important you may ask? Mhhh, the ultimate goal of the NWO
(New World Order) is what? Yeah, a one world government, financial
management system (currency included) and the same laws! To achieve
this you have to undertake incremental steps like forming a European
Union, North American Union, African Union, etc. If you only have a
couple of regions/organizations left it'll be a whole lot easier to
form then a one world government!
Thus, as the A.U. is too weak, you have to come up with another
organization. Is there any? Yep, indeed! There is one! The United
States of Africa (USA)! :D
What does it have to do with the riots in Libya? Well, guess who the
chairman of the USA (United States of Africa) is Gaddhafi! Oh shit!
No, not really because he was always supported by the West. So, what
does the West have for a problem with Gaddhafi then? To put it
straight, he has different opions on how the system of the USA should
look like. He stated that there should be only one political party
because a multi-party-system would lead to bloodshed! Woah, that's
intriguing. Guess what? The West does not like this idea because it is
obviously a dictatorship ... well we all live in one as well but it
looks and feels nicer! At least on the surface it should give all the
people, including us, the idea of a bright shining democratic and
humanitarian system.
Hence, the West has to replace him to provide the USA (United States
of Africa) a leader which coincides with the West's picture of an
union.
Here are two links you all should consider. The first one is an
article from Wikipedia and the second one contains an article from the
BBC reporting over the last summit.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_of_Africa#cite_note-divisi...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/7868828.stm
Update 1:
Only a couple of days ago after I spoke my mind about the ongoings in
Libya, the BBC published an article which stated that the Libyan
rebels signed a deal with Qatar to export oil from the Rebels'
controled land. Here is the quote:"We are producing about 100,000 to
130,000 barrels a day, we can easily up that to about 300,000 a day."
You can find the full article here:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-12875810
Oh, I almost forgot to mention the primordial purpose of the
Coalition's bombings ... to protect the Libyan population from air
attacks. If you, as a country, have the intention to stop these
bombings to prevent a massacre, what do you have to do? You have to
bomb, as well! :D
In this case not the population but the anti-air installations to then
be easier able to impose a no-fly zone. But as you have Americans on
board there could be some collateral damage, like always. ^^
According to German news 'Tagesschau' Obama stated that "Gaddhafi
needs to step down" because he lost the confidence of his people
(which he never had before but the West didn't care anyways) so that
he holds no legitimacy anymore. Oh, and from tomorrow on the
Coalition's forces are put under order of the NATO. It is currently
aimed to support the Rebels forces and by "support" I don't mean air
strikes but weapons or I don't know ... We will see!
Here is the full speech of Obama:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jRf6UVwVOE4
Update 2:
Today I read an article pointing out the reasons for
interventions from the West. The report was written by Susan Lindauer,
former U.S. Asset who covered Libya at the United Nations from 1995 to
2003. She claims that American oil companies forced the government to
oppose Gaddhafi because he introduced "special" fees targeted at
American oil companies to get his money back from the compensations he
had to pay for the victims of the plane bombing of Pan AM flight 103.
You can read the article hear.
http://weeklyintercept.blogspot.com/2011/04/libyas-blood-for-oil-vamp...
Update 3:
Oh yes, baby! There we have it! Not only were the Western oil companies forced to pay a hefty fee but Gaddhifi considered to nationalize oil companies! (That would be cool, though!) The main reason for his consideration is based on "low oil prices", he said one month ago towards students of the prestigious Georgetown University. Furthermore Libyan authorities told oil firms "to cut output by 270,000 barrels per day from January 1". My second news update refered to Western oil companies, especially American ones, who headed to D.C. to start whining about the current situation in Libya. To me, it seems that the U.S. tolerated the fee but went "postal" after they had heard what Gaddhafi has been put into Libya's consideration! :D
Gaddhafi also thought about leaving the OPEC due to its quotas. He stated that Libya would not accept the current oil price and would then, as a result of the price, cease exports.
Wow, someone did not want to play the (fucked up) Americans' game here, right?
You can read the full article here:
http://uk.reuters.com/article/2009/01/21/businessproind-us-libya-gaddafi-oil-idUKTRE50K61F20090121
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)